See Volume 2. See Volume 3.
The box set contains 4 CDs and 4 booklets, one in English, one in French, one in German and one with the sung texts and translations in all three languages.
The Download comes with a 110-page PDF booklet with the notes, sung texts and translations in English, French and German.
Recording polyphony - stalking perfection
"I
have never thought that concerts and recordings are the same thing. I'm delighted
when members of our audiences say they are, since then they will have
experienced all the thrill of the live event while imagining they have also had
the controlled perfection of a recording session; but in reality it cannot be
so. At best the differences between the two may be slight, but no ensemble in
existence can maintain in one live performance the accuracy inherent in several
studio takes - and every live audience will inevitably add noises of its own.
Concerts
are real-time, human events where anything can happen, exceptional and
disastrous; whereas nobody wants to listen repeatedly to a recording which has
obvious blemishes. Wrong notes, poor ensemble, technical mishaps, intrusive
outside noise will all detract from how powerfully the music comes over to the
listener when its performers are not there in person to engage his or her
interest. It is the difference between theatre and film.
And
polyphony of its nature demands a special kind of precision from its
performers. We may forget that the standard way of performing polyphony in
1973, when I started The Tallis Scholars, was with vibrato-ful voices, trained
for later repertoires. But polyphony is full of detail. Its lines need clarity
for all the interest in them to be heard: if they are sung with vibrato they
become muddy and the detail obscured. When this happens there is little left to
enjoy. Building on what The Clerkes of Oxenford had achieved in terms of
precision and clarity, I founded The Tallis Scholars with the specific
intention of guaranteeing good tuning and blend.
So
I make no apology for doing as many takes on session as I think necessary to
have that precision, and then editing them together to have the best of each. I
have always been acutely aware of the possibility of editing out the magic, but
I am also aware that part of the expressive element in performing polyphony is
the beauty of the basic sound which the ensemble is making. In putting a disc
together one has a choice, often a number of choices, and I long ago realized
that part of my job as an editor of tapes would be constantly to have to make
decisions of the most subtle kind. I haven't always got it right, but at the
back of my mind has been the hope that I could find the magic spread across a
succession of performances, and edit it in.
Nor
is this process sterile. Throughout the thirty years of Gimell Records which we
are now celebrating, we have mainly recorded in two magnificent sacred
buildings: Merton College Chapel in Oxford and Salle Church in Norfolk. These
are not like studios, but are living, vibrant and unpredictable spaces which
challenge us to the hilt to capture the projection of our voices as they
resonate round them. How well we have managed that is essential to the final
result: I am not editing a deracinated succession of notes, but sounds in a
space which has become an integral part of the performance.
The
advantage of being a commercially successful independent company is that we can
afford to spend time and money on stalking the kind of perfection which makes
this music come alive today. The aesthetic thrill of finding it, when one does,
can be very special. Such a reward is very different from the adrenalin of
conducting a concert; but in 50 discs (and 30 years making them) I have never
tired of the search. And there is more to come." © 2010 Peter Phillips
Allegri
Of all the pieces The Tallis Scholars are asked to sing in
concert, Allegri's Miserere - which we have sung over 350 times
throughout the world - is the most in demand. The story of its composition is
a good one, but it would be of much less interest if the music hadn't been
written to be performed in the Sistine Chapel, where the musicians would have
been surrounded by Michelangelo's newly painted frescos. I sometimes stand
on stages before a performance of the Allegri and invite the audience to
imagine themselves in the Sistine Chapel, the famous choir gallery halfway up
the wall on my left, the soloists grouped there, the highest voice launching the
top C into the vault. However dissimilar the actual performance venue, this
image of heaven-on-earth always enhances the experience. Actually to perform
in the Sistine Chapel, as we did in 1994, remains the most memorable thing we
have ever done.
The
story is straightforward enough. The music was written sometime before 1638; by
the middle of the eighteenth century it had become so famous that the Papacy
forbade anyone to sing it outside the Sistine Chapel, in order to enhance the
reputation of the Papal choir. It is alleged that the music finally escaped
when Mozart at the age of fourteen wrote it down from memory. That he did this
is certain since, even though the actual copy he made does not survive, a
letter from his father to his mother describing the incident does. In fact
there were other copies of the Miserere outside the Vatican by then,
though it was only about the time of Mozart's visit in 1770 that the music
became widely available.
However,
just as the Pope had feared, once the Miserere was heard outside the
magical confines of the Sistine Chapel, the music was found to lose its power
to astonish. The problem with any performance of it, then as now, is that what
Gregorio Allegri himself composed is simple and plain. Everything depends on the
embellishments which are added to Allegri's chords. There was a tradition of
improvising amongst the Papal singers which no other group of singers could
match, so in a way the fact that copies of the music escaped the confines of
the Vatican didn't make much difference to the fame or development of the
piece: one still had to go to the Sistine Chapel to hear it sung to its fullest
potential. It seems likely that the embellishments got more and more effective
as the decades passed until by the end of the nineteenth century the best of
them had also been written down and become part of the composition. By then
they included the high C which has so characterized the piece in recent times.
We
present here our landmark 1980 recording of the Allegri, with which we set up
Gimell Records thirty years ago. (Although it was originally released as an LP
on EMI's Classics for Pleasure label it was paid for by the fledgling
Gimell and Gimell who subsequently released it on CD.) The soloist, Alison
Stamp, sang all the solo verses with the same embellishments, as had been the
custom with performances for many decades and which continues to be the
standard version. Also following the practice of many decades we sang the chant
verses to Tone 2. This procedure was followed exactly on our filmed
performance, in Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome in 1994, available on DVD (The
Tallis Scholars Live in Rome). However our third recording, made in 2005,
is slightly different, both in its chant and its solo embellishments. The
result can be heard on the third volume in this series.
Byrd
England has never produced a greater composer than William Byrd.
For range of expression he towered above his contemporaries, with only Tallis,
already middle-aged when Byrd was born, in the same category of achievement. It
stands to reason therefore that for a group such as The Tallis Scholars,
dedicated to exploring Renais sance polyphony, Byrd's music has been central.
We have made two discs entirely devoted to him; included his Tribue, Domine
on our Live in Oxford collection; included his Lullaby on our Christmas
Carols and Motets anthology; and made a BBC TV programme titled Playing
Elizabeth's Tune exploring his life and work, now available on a Gimell
DVD. His music has featured in over a third of our 1,700 concerts.
Anyone
listening to Byrd's church music will be struck by the fundamental difference
in outlook between his Protestant and his Catholic writing. The former has
English words and a style which, at least in theory, was simple enough to
ensure that those words could be heard; the latter has Latin words coupled to
an elaborate compositional method which referred back to the kind of music
the Reformation had hoped to put a stop to.
Although
it is true that this division between simple and complex was not as firmly maintained by Byrd's time as it has been in Tallis's younger days (Queen Elizabeth
was less doctrinaire than her predecessors), it still explains why the two
repertoires do not resemble each other. The message of the Latin-texted Masses,
for example, seems to be directed inwards, towards contemplation through
melody, suitable for a family circle; which contrasts with the manner of the
Anglican Great Service, where the lines push outwards through studied
declamation of the texts, suitable for performance before a big crowd.
Nothing
is more essentially Catholic than settings of the Mass, a point which would not
have been lost on Elizabeth I's secret police, dedicated as they were to
tracking down and harassing believers in the old religion. No one had set these
texts in England since Queen Mary's reign some decades before (and would not do
so again for three hundred years), so Byrd's three settings - for three, four
and five voices - stand isolated in time. But the really daring part of the
story is that he published this music, admittedly in small volumes without
title-pages, but with his name clearly given. Having taken such risks it is not
surprising to find that the music itself is deeply expressive. The four-part
Mass is probably the earliest of the set, almost certainly written in 1592; the
three-part seems to have come next, using just alto, tenor and bass voices. The
five-part Mass was written last, probably by 1595, and seems the most mature of
the three, both in the confidence with which Byrd handled his texts and in
remaining within ever more focused boundaries: the Kyrie and Gloria are shorter
and more closely argued than in the four-part, whereas the final passage in the
Credo - from ‘Et in Spiritum Sanctum' to the end - is substantially longer,
which gives a better balance to the movement as a whole. There is a sense that
the four-part acted as a model for the others, which Byrd improved upon where
he could, with the result that his five-part Mass is one of the most convincingly
argued, as well as sonorous, achievements in all his music. The repetition of
the words ‘Agnus Dei' in the final movement, for example, is unforgettably
powerful.
Byrd's
justly famous Ave verum corpus belongs to the world of the Masses,
having been published in the 1605 Gradualia but probably written in the
1590s. Like the Masses it was written for recusant choirs to sing, and
similarly aims to create a rapt, almost mystical atmosphere. The text, which
dates from the fourteenth century and takes the form of a Eucharistic hymn, is
a meditation on the real presence of Christ in the sacrament of the Mass, a
belief central to Catholic teaching. The way Byrd set the words ‘O dulcis, O
pie, O Jesu fili Mariae' unmistakably shows the depth of his faith.
Victoria
Settings of the Requiem Mass are among the most frequent requests
for concert music. This may seem unlikely, given the subject matter, but in
fact it is just that subject matter which makes them so compelling. There is a
drama inherent in the text which never fails to move audiences, having, in the
first place, brought out the best in the composer. It is not a modern kind of
drama such as we are used to seeing in the cinema or on television, but rather
of the opposite: of the light which is shining on the deceased (whose body
would have been present in the original performances), of the immediacy of
heaven, of the peace which death will bring. Put in words this may sound a bit
far-fetched, but from the split second that the opening ‘Requiem aeternam'
chant is heard, every listener is inevitably transported. It is a classic
instance of the power of music over every other art-form to communicate without
reserve.
This
drama gradually moves through different stages as the music proceeds. The
essential mood is the one of the opening - long-held chords inviting the
contemplation of eternal rest. This is the Requiem's alternative to the
atmosphere of desperation, noise and betrayal which underpins so many
television thrillers. It returns at regular intervals - in the Gradual, the
Sanctus and Agnus Dei, through the promise of perpetual light in the Communion
- but is interrupted in the Offertory and the Responsory by the thought of what
will happen if Christ does not deliver the departed soul from the pains of
hell. In every setting the ‘essential mood' becomes unbearably intensified in
these passages, though the musical style may not change very much. One recoils
from the ‘poenis inferni' (the ‘pains of hell'), the ‘ore leonis' (the ‘lion's
mouth'), the ‘dies irae, calamitatis et miseriae' (the ‘day of wrath, calamity
and woe'). Indeed the Responsory represents a mini-drama within the whole,
piling agony on agony as the pace of the music quickens by alternating brief
chant passages with abbreviated polyphony. But in both the Offertory and the
Responsory calm is restored by the idea of light: ‘let Saint Michael bring them
forth into the holy light' in the Offertory, and ‘lux perpetua' (‘light
perpetual') in the Responsory.
The
main reason why Victoria's six-voice Requiem is one of the greatest
masterpieces of the entire Renaissance period is that this mood perfectly
summed up the composer's view of life and death. There was no better text for a
committed Catholic priest to set. In doing so Victoria created a sound-world
which, although it was not original, gained a dimension not imagined before. In
fact the Requiem (or Missa pro defunctis) had long been a favourite text
of Iberian composers, from the late fifteenth-century setting of Pedro de
Escobar onwards. This continued through the sixteenth century with, in
particular, two versions by Morales, through to the High Renaissance and the
setting by Guerrero amongst others. And by the early years of the seventeenth
century the school of composers based in Évora, Portugal, were making their own
contribution.
Victoria
wrote his Requiem for the funeral in 1603 of the Dowager Empress Maria,
daughter of Charles V, wife of Maximilian II, mother of two emperors and sister
of Philip II of Spain. For some years Victoria had been her chaplain. The music
was published in 1605 in a print which contained nothing other than the
movements associated with the funeral service, though some of these were extra
to the normal sequence. In particular Victoria included the four-voice Taedet
animam meam and the six-voice Versa est in luctum, though no one is
entirely sure when these would have been sung. We omit the Taedet here
not least because its style is very different from that of the Requiem proper,
but include the Versa est in luctum as a postlude. All the music
recorded here is therefore scored for SSATTB, with the second soprano part
carrying the chant cantus firmus for most of the time. This may not be fully
audible to the naked ear, since it often disappears into the surrounding part-writing
which at times moves as slowly as the chant itself. Victoria himself printed
most of the unaccompanied chant incipits to be heard on this recording, though
the editor we consulted, Bruno Turner, provided the short second ‘Agnus Dei'
and the final ‘Requiescant in pace'.
Tallis
In recent years it has become more and more apparent to me that
Tallis was one of the greatest, and most competent, experimenters in the
history of European Renaissance music. Who else at that time was able to write
a forty-part motet of the highest quality and four-part syllabic anthems so
beautiful that they effectively established a new school of composition? Who
else in the High Renaissance was both interested and capable of writing music
of the kind of mathematical complexity which Tallis shows in his seven-voice Miserere,
while also finding new ways of deploying the English high treble voice,
traditionally associated with Latin texts, as he does to English words in Blessed
are those that be undefiled? The range of his achievement is simply unique.
Part
of the explanation for this range of achievement is that Tallis lived through
one of the most turbulent periods in English religious history, and in doing so
had to write in the musical style of the moment. For the Catholics this was
elaborate music, with Latin words and big sonorities. For the Protestants it
was, at first, very simple music with English words, so syllabic that every
syllable could be clearly heard by the congregation; and then, in Elizabeth I's
reign, a kind of relaxed simplicity, a halfway house, in which the ideal was
both that the words could be heard clearly and also that the music should be
interesting. By virtue of being a supreme craftsman as well as an inspired
composer, Tallis was able to meet all these conflicting requirements without
seeming to be fake.
So
outstanding is Spem in alium that it still seems impossible that one
mind without a computer could have managed it. To write for forty voices which
do not repeat themselves in consecutive motion and not to lose control of the
whole colossal edifice, is to set a challenge which even the Art of Fugue
scarcely rivals. The actual compositional style of it is slightly blurred
between those characteristics implied by the Catholic and Elizabethan styles
described above - sometimes imitative between (some of) the parts, sometimes
setting the text syllabically, never dealing in the unrestrained melismas of
much of his purest Catholic music - and so it is not fully established whether
Tallis wrote it for Queen Mary or Elizabeth I (both of whom celebrated their
fortieth birthdays whilst on the throne) or for some more abstract reason,
perhaps to do with the Biblical number 40. But for us in our modern terms, as
for Tallis himself, Spem remains the ultimate technical challenge -
supremely difficult to bring off, supremely rewarding when one comes near.
Sancte
Deus is
a classic example of Tallis's Catholic style, illustrating what I mean above by
‘unrestrained melismas'. A melisma is a melodic line which only uses one
syllable, like the ‘A' of Amen, allowing the composer's imagination to fly free
of text-setting. This essentially abstract way of thinking was admired by the
pre-Reformation Catholics, and needless to say was particularly objected to by
the Protestants. The Salvator mundi settings (the second much less
famous than the first) are Elizabethan and so more compact; but Gaude
gloriosa is one of the most elaborate Catholic compositions of the entire
period. Unlike Spem it is colossal in length rather than height, using
the nine exclamations of ‘Gaude' in the text to work up a construction which is
essentially architectural. The music flows from one scoring to another to yet
another, never using more than six voices at any given moment, but with such an
exquisite control of melody and sense of overall direction that the final pages
feel as if the listener has just completed the journey of a lifetime. It comes
as no surprise that Gaude gloriosa was influential - William Mundy based
his Vox Patris caelestis on it - and would have been more so if the
Catholic style hadn't been so soon overturned by Elizabeth's accession.
The
seven-voice Miserere nostri is both a demonstration of technical skill,
and, in its ‘music of the spheres' way, possessed of an unearthly beauty. It is
a canon six in two with a free tenor, which is to say there are two canonic
melodies, one sung by the two top parts which is easily audible, while the
other is shared between four of the other voices. This second canon has its
four contributors starting at the same time, but going off at different speeds
(the first counter tenor has the model melody which the second countertenor
sings in double augmentation, the second bass sings this melody inverted and
augmented, and the first bass has it inverted and in triple augmentation). Both
this piece and Loquebantur variis linguis are scored for SSAATBB and are
probably Elizabethan.
All
the remaining pieces were written in Tallis's most Protestant period, during
the reign of Edward VI (1547-1553). Nothing could be further removed from the
glories of Spem or Gaude gloriosa. Gone are the melismas, the
Latin texts, the interweaving of the lines in polyphony. The accent is now on
simplicity and comprehension - hence the English texts and the chordal style
which was designed to make the words audible. One may think one knows what
Tallis must have thought of this clipping of his wings, but at least he was not
a man to sulk. His craftsmanship enabled him to adapt swiftly to the new
realities and in a matter of a year or two he wrote some of the best-known and
best-loved Anglican music there has ever been. Not all these tiny masterpieces
are as famous as If ye love me, but they all bear repetition, as Vaughan
Williams thought when he based his Fantasia on a Theme by Thomas Tallis
on the third Tune for Archbishop Parker.
Josquin
The Tallis Scholars have recently undertaken to record all of
Josquin's Masses, a decision which was partly reached as a result of the
success of our 1986 recording of the Missa Pange lingua and the Missa
La sol fa re mi, our first Josquin disc. Since then we have gone on to
record eight more of the available sixteen or seventeen Masses accredited to
Josquin, bringing us within sight of a series which will have spanned our
career to date. Although not as famous as the Missa Pange lingua, the Missa
La sol fa re mi is in many ways just as complete a vehicle for displaying
Josquin's genius: yet another variation on the technique of keeping four
voices constantly alive, constantly moving.
La
sol fa re mi, as its name implies, is based on the solmization of notes which
these syllables represented in the medieval scale: A, G, F, D and E. Virtually
the whole Mass is derived from this single five-note phrase, which may be
clearly heard in different note-lengths and occasionally in different pitches
in one or other of the parts. It is mostly found in the tenor (which in fact
does not differ significantly in tessitura from the alto part). To write an
entire Mass-setting which strictly retains the statement of five notes
throughout as a kind of very abrupt cantus firmus is an astonishing feat of
inventiveness. Josquin had tried out the same technique in an earlier Mass
entitled Faisant regretz (based on ‘fa re mi re') but had there allowed
himself the opportunity of transposing the ostinato up and down by step, a
procedure which was commonly followed by other composers of the time, like
Obrecht and Isaac. The technique of La sol fa re mi, on the other hand,
was sophisticated and rare.
However
it was not Josquin's idea in the first place to use these notes. According to
the Swiss music theorist Henricus Glareanus, writing in 1547, they originated
in mimicry of an unknown potentate who used to send away importunate suitors
with the words ‘Lascia fare mi' (‘Leave it to me'). Whether this is true or
not, a number of popular songs of the time were written around the phrase.
Apart from basing the tenor on it almost exclusively, Josquin was able to lend
it to the other parts in his Mass-setting by the technique of initial
imitation, for instance in the ‘Christe' and first ‘Hosanna'. The ‘Pleni sunt'
is imitative throughout. Only once (in the bass part at the end of the
‘Christe') is the ostinato transposed to begin on D (subsequently necessitating
a B flat). Otherwise, in more than two hundred repetitions, it starts on A or
E. Perhaps the finest moment comes at the very end of the ‘Agnus Dei' (I and
III) where the note-lengths of the ostinato become shorter and shorter as the
mystical nature of the music intensifies.
Clemens non Papa
& Crecquillon
The music of Jacob Clemens has long been represented on Tallis
Scholars' concert programmes and on our Summer School courses by virtue of
the popularity of his seven-voice motet Ego flos campi. This gem of a
motet seems to be known to everybody these days, though this was hardly the
case when we recorded it in 1987. Nonetheless it does encapsulate Clemens's
particular style: introverted, contemplative, creating a mystical atmosphere by
the constant repetition of material while alternating intensely argued
polyphonic passages with chords of great beauty. Ironically the equally
impressive eight-voice Pater peccavi shows just these same
characteristics and yet has been shown, since 1987, to have been written by one
of Clemens's close contemporaries, Thomas Crecquillon. The confusion of author
is not surprising.
Jacob
Clemens (called Clemens non Papa) was one of the later representatives of the
school of Flemish composers, who collectively so dominated European music in
the Renaissance period. In the hierarchy of that school he was of the fourth
generation alongside Gombert and Crecquillon, the previous generations being
represented by Dufay; Ockeghem and Obrecht; Josquin and Isaac; with Lassus and
de Monte yet to come as the fifth and last. Unlike many of his colleagues who
were open to all the innovations of their time, Clemens remained a conservative
figure, preferring to continue with the introverted, reflective style of
composition which so well suited his predecessors, and resisting the
increasingly humanistic style of the Italians. Although it was the fashion
amongst Flemish musicians to study and work in Italy, there is no evidence that
Clemens ever did. This lack of interest in outside inspiration makes Clemens an
unusually valuable contributor to the Flemish school, preserving his
old-fashioned view while compatriots like Willaert (in Venice), de Rore and de
Wert (itinerant in northern Italy), and Lassus (in Munich) were moving slowly
out of the Renaissance altogether. As it turned out this move was the death of
the Flemish school, since the Italians proved to be much better at Baroque
thought and Monteverdi's revolution was an entirely Italian affair. Clemens's
music shows Flemish artistry at its most typical. Clemens's posthumous
reputation has been coloured by some strange circumstances - his enigmatic
nickname, his lack of precise dates and therefore of anniversary years; and
the fact that much of his finest work is to Dutch texts (the Souter
liedekens). The nickname seems to have been nothing more than an
affectionate joke. There is no obvious reason why it should have been necessary
to distinguish him from Pope Clement VII (who anyway died in 1534), nor why he
should have been confused with the poet Jacobus Papa in Ieper (Ypres), who
happened to have the same first name as him, though these things are sometimes
claimed. Clemens spent most of his life in Flanders, especially in Bruges,
Antwerp and Ypres; but he also regularly visited the southernmost parts of
present-day Holland, appearing for instance in Leiden, Dordrecht and
's-Hertogenbosch. It was for the Marian Brotherhood in 's-Hertogenbosch in 1550
that he wrote Ego flos campi. The old-fashioned element in Clemens's
technique is his consistent use of imitative counterpoint, using chordal
movement sparingly and for special effects. Not only that, he also tended to
work the counterpoint at greater length than most composers, re-stating the melodies
several times in prolonged schemes of imitation. This is especially true of his
liturgical music, and may be heard clearly in the Mass Pastores quidnam
vidistis. This method heightens the elusive, abstract nature of his
thought, while reducing the precise meaning of the words to a position of
relative unimportance. This, of course, was the very opposite of the Italian
Baroque approach, though it should be emphasized that the general meaning of
the words is essential to the mystical atmosphere which Clemens so perfectly
evokes. This Mass is scored for SSATB except the third Agnus Dei which adds
another bass part to the existing choir, and provides a sonorous conclusion to
this very substantial Mass-setting. Clemens's other compositions maintain the same
mood and style of composition. Since he was unusually prolific - probably
writing his 233 motets, 15 Masses and 159 vernacular Psalms in little more than
ten years - it is hard to be completely certain that they are typical of all
his work, though this seems very likely. Tribulationes civitatum is a
men's-voices only motet, scored for ATTB. It was composed in a single
continuous section, though it hints at the two-part format of Pater peccavi
and many other motets of this period, by the repeat of the haunting phrase
‘Domine, miserere' halfway through and at the end. The dark sonorities it
evokes are telling; and very different from the almost luxurious scoring of Pater
peccavi, which is an eight-part (not double choir) SSAATTBB motet in two
sections. This masterpiece, with its resonant chords, tells the story of the
return of the Prodigal Son, each section ending with a repeat of the central
words ‘Fac me sicut unum ex mercenariis tuis'. Ego flos campi is more
homophonic, partly so that the words ‘sicut lilium inter spinas', which formed
the motto of the 's-Hertogenbosch Brotherhood, could stand out. The seven
voices SSATTBB (unique in Clemens' output) symbolize the mystical Marian
number.
Sheppard
John Sheppard has his own niche in English music, a composer who,
unlike Tallis but like Clemens, found one style of composition and stuck to it.
His characteristic style may be summed up as: involving a high treble part,
which leads to breath-taking sonorities; doubling the countertenor part to give
extra weight and detail to the middle of his sound; relying on the
old-fashioned quoting of a chant cantus firmus line, in equal-length long notes
and almost always in the tenor; and the persistent, quirky use of a certain
kind of dissonance, created by allowing major and minor thirds to be sung at
the same time and so to clash. Media vita is his masterpiece, unrivalled
for its breadth of phrase and expressive power, summing up everything about him
and his creative world.
Its
text consists of the antiphon to the Nunc dimittis at Compline on the
major Feast Days in the two weeks before Passion Sunday. The Nunc dimittis
itself is the only part of the text to be sung to chant alone, while the
antiphon text, which for days of such importance contained a verse and respond
structure within itself, is set in polyphony complete. The first two verses are
for men's voices, the third for two trebles, two means and bass, and each is
followed by all or part of the response ‘Sancte Deus. Sancte fortis. Sancte et
misericors Salvator'. The composition begins with some of the most haunting
words in any of the Offices: ‘Media vita in morte sumus' (‘In the midst of life
we are in death'). It was in setting these words that Sheppard conceived one of
the greatest passages in all Tudor polyphony.
Cornysh
Cornysh was an early and rare example of what is now called the
‘Renaissance artist', or possibly two Renaissance artists, since we may be
dealing with a father and son of the same name. Men of remarkable intelligence,
‘William Cornysh' was well known in his lifetime not only as an outstanding
musician, but also as a poet, dramatist and actor. Unfortunately none of his
dramatic writings has survived, though there is a poem by him in the British
Library entitled A Treatise bitwene Trouth and Enformacion which was
written while serving a jail sentence in the Fleet prison. In this he claimed
that he had been convicted by false information and thus wrongfully
accused, though it is not known exactly what the accusation was. As an actor he
took part in many plays at court, some of which have survived, including The
Golden Arbour (1511) and the Triumph of Love and Beauty (1514). But
it was within the activities of the court masque that he would have had the
ideal opportunity to show off his many talents. In 1501 he is reported as
having devised the pageants and ‘disguysings' for the marriage festivities of
Arthur, Prince of Wales and Katherine of Aragon. More importantly, in June 1520
he led the Chapel Royal's ceremonies at the Field of the Cloth of Gold, which
included not only singing but also a full-scale pageant. In 1522 the Emperor
Charles V visited England to negotiate with Henry VIII and on 15 June the court
was entertained with a play by Cornysh which outlined in simple allegory the
progress of the discussions and their expected outcome. As a musician Cornysh
had the most prestigious employment at court - as Master of the Children of the
Chapel Royal - which he fulfilled from 1509 until his death in 1523. Part of
his job was to train the choristers, and it is probable that he was responsible
for the very high standard of singing in the Chapel Royal choir which so amazed
the French in the early years of the sixteenth century. In September 1513
Cornysh took the choir to France, giving performances in the area around Lille,
and there survive several descriptions of how impressive these performances
were. Their reception was almost certainly caused by the combination of the
high treble voice and the technically very intricate style of English
compositions of that time.
Nothing
would have shown this off better than his own Salve regina, which gives
the word ‘virtuoso' a new and excitingly polyphonic perspective. Here are
embellishments which make some of Monteverdi's, written in the early Baroque
period for solo voice and continuo, seem routine; and yet Cornysh's are to be
sung chorally. I can think of no greater test of choral technique than some of
the writing in the Eton Choirbook, from which this Salve regina is taken.
The Gaude virgo mater Christi included here is less hectic in its
detail, but still a testing piece to perform for choirs brought up on Byrd's Ave
verum or Tallis's If ye love me. The least one can say about
Cornysh's style is that it is less introverted than that of his greatest
contemporary, John Browne. By comparison Cornysh always seemed to be striving
for the most brilliant effect or the most pathetic tone, a way of thinking
which would have made him perfectly suited to the madrigal a hundred years
later, and makes him reminiscent of Thomas Weelkes.
Palestrina
Among Palestrina's twenty-two six-part settings of the Mass, the Missa
Assumpta est Maria and the Missa Papae Marcelli have long been the
most celebrated. In both cases the power of the writing is largely attributable
to bright sonorities: both have two tenor parts and Assumpta est Maria
also has two soprano parts. No Renaissance composer, and few later ones, have
been as proficient as Palestrina at writing positive, outward-going, major-key
music, and in this context Assumpta est Maria represents one of the most
important works of the period. It is interesting to follow the historical
process by which a work such as the Missa Assumpta est Maria becomes so
much more famous than any other comparable work. It is not essentially that it
is a better piece of music than all the other contenders. The Missa Assumpta
est Maria is not better than Palestrina's fine six-part Mass Benedicta
es caelorum, but it is better known because at some early stage it caught
the eye of an editor who, by publishing an inexpensive edition of it,
established a demand which the quality of the music was able to sustain. The
whole system of reputation in pre-Baroque music rests largely on historical
accident and is open to review at any time. It also seems to help a piece if
there is an attractive story to go with it: the Missa Papae Marcelli has
undoubtedly benefited from this. There have been at least twenty different
editions of Papae Marcelli since the middle of the nineteenth century
and ten of Assumpta est Maria (of which the first was prepared by Carl
Proske in 1835). Palestrina's earliest success in modern times was the
eight-part Stabat mater which first appeared in Paris in 1810 and has so
far received fifteen editions, including one by Richard Wagner. On the other
hand, The Tallis Scholars had to rely on their own editions for recordings of
the Masses Sicut lilium, Nigra sum, Benedicta es and Nasce
la gioja mia. In general, public preference has been for Palestrina's later
works, of which the Missa Assumpta est Maria is one. The greater
precision of thought which characterized Palestrina's writing after the Council
of Trent has found favour throughout the Christian world. Indeed such pieces as
the Missa Assumpta est Maria have regularly been performed in recent
years in Protestant services where the kind of syllabic setting shown, for
example, at the beginning of the Gloria, is in line with one of the founding
principles of all the reformed religions. The more relaxed, more abstract style
of some of Palestrina's earlier Mass-settings has not often been heard in church services since the first half of the sixteenth century,
but it has increasingly attracted a following among concert-goers who pay to
hear the music as music, rather than as an adjunct to worship. It is a feature
of modern music-making that professional concert choirs do not necessarily
choose the same repertoire as that of church choirs, even though they make
their selection from the same composers. Neither the motet nor the Mass Assumpta
est Maria was published in Palestrina's lifetime, which supports the idea
that they were late works, since all those settings most likely to sell had
appeared in print before the composer's old age. The musical style of them both
supports this too: there is noticeably little thorough imitation between all
six parts, but there is a great deal of block-chord writing. In the motet the
lack of real independence in the part-writing is apparent from the beginning,
and by the words ‘benedicunt Dominum' all counterpoint is briefly suspended.
These features inevitably transfer themselves to the Mass, most obviously in
the Gloria and Credo, but also in the shorter movements where greater
elaboration was customary. The first Kyrie, for example, begins with imitation
between all the parts but very quickly has settled into alternating,
harmonically controlled phrases which rely for their effect on being re-scored.
It is the inventiveness of these different sub-divisions of the main choir,
constantly grouping and regrouping, and the elastic way in which the text is
set, which gives this music its irrepressible character.
© 2010 Peter Phillips